No Bass with XM?
10-15-2010, 10:11 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 11-27-2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,115
No Bass with XM?
Sorry if this has already been covered, but wondered if you all had also experienced that XM seems to have very low Bass content? Pretty obvious if you switch from an XM music station to a CD without changing equalization.
Does that have something to do with bandwidth and signal strength? Seems like the receiver should be set up to compensate if that is the case. But if the content is not there to begin, then ???
Does that have something to do with bandwidth and signal strength? Seems like the receiver should be set up to compensate if that is the case. But if the content is not there to begin, then ???
10-15-2010, 10:22 PM
#2
Deceased
Join Date: 06-30-2010
Location: Kannapolis NC
Posts: 25,739
You're hearing some compression of the signal from XM. As an old radio guy and broadcaster I can tell you that the audio quality of the XM signal is not CD quality as claimed. You just have to adjust the equalization settings to compensate as needed. The CD player will always give the best sound compared to a broadcast signal or MP3 file.
10-16-2010, 01:17 AM
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 11-27-2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,115
You're hearing some compression of the signal from XM. As an old radio guy and broadcaster I can tell you that the audio quality of the XM signal is not CD quality as claimed. You just have to adjust the equalization settings to compensate as needed. The CD player will always give the best sound compared to a broadcast signal or MP3 file.
On a different note, noticed you are a Corvair fan. A couple of my buddies had really nice Corvairs back a few decades ago, one was a Yenko Stinger, another, a turbocharged Corvair that made decent HP and with his suspension mods was a really nice handling car as well.
10-16-2010, 04:30 PM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-06-2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,869
You're hearing some compression of the signal from XM. As an old radio guy and broadcaster I can tell you that the audio quality of the XM signal is not CD quality as claimed. You just have to adjust the equalization settings to compensate as needed. The CD player will always give the best sound compared to a broadcast signal or MP3 file.
I don't have XM but know this for a fact with MP3...... Any kind of compression in music actually removes frequencies that are meant to be heard. Being a musician and done some recording I've heard a lot "disappear" when converting my music to MP3...... Even though I have an input jack on my stereo in the HHR I won't use it, would never own an iThing
...... and won't even make MP3 compilation CDs.I don't even "rip and burn" CDs, I record them one machine to another, mix them down and render new CDs with the songs I want.
10-16-2010, 10:38 PM
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-01-2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 284
XM got considerably worse when they bought Sirius. I believe they added some channels from Sirius to their line-up. The satellite has only so much total bandwidth. To get more stations you need to reduce the quality of each channel (sort of like the airlines moving the seats closer to get in more people 
). They "shorted" some channels more than others. "Talk" channels were already more compressed, and I believe they took more from them. Classic Rock lost a lot of bass but Deep Tracks didn't lose as much. I believe they made some decisions based on their opinion of what channels would show it less, and which listeners would miss it less. Personally, I think it sucks.
). They "shorted" some channels more than others. "Talk" channels were already more compressed, and I believe they took more from them. Classic Rock lost a lot of bass but Deep Tracks didn't lose as much. I believe they made some decisions based on their opinion of what channels would show it less, and which listeners would miss it less. Personally, I think it sucks.
10-17-2010, 06:01 AM
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: 08-10-2010
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 102
I believe SIRIUS bought XM, not the other way around (but not happy with either one - rant another day 
).
Back to the original post....Is this why the "speed compensated volume" does not seem to work on my radio? Also I do not seem to have much bass either. I have the bass set to "max" but not much different than the "middle" setting. BTW, I use a remote satellite receiver (allows me to move to other vehicles) that is connected via the AUX port.
).Back to the original post....Is this why the "speed compensated volume" does not seem to work on my radio? Also I do not seem to have much bass either. I have the bass set to "max" but not much different than the "middle" setting. BTW, I use a remote satellite receiver (allows me to move to other vehicles) that is connected via the AUX port.
10-17-2010, 10:03 AM
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 11-27-2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,115
I believe SIRIUS bought XM, not the other way around (but not happy with either one - rant another day ).
Back to the original post....Is this why the "speed compensated volume" does not seem to work on my radio? Also I do not seem to have much bass either. I have the bass set to "max" but not much different than the "middle" setting. BTW, I use a remote satellite receiver (allows me to move to other vehicles) that is connected via the AUX port.
).Back to the original post....Is this why the "speed compensated volume" does not seem to work on my radio? Also I do not seem to have much bass either. I have the bass set to "max" but not much different than the "middle" setting. BTW, I use a remote satellite receiver (allows me to move to other vehicles) that is connected via the AUX port.
10-17-2010, 10:41 AM
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: 08-10-2010
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 102
I will try a CD and see (hear) what happens. I will also try the speed compensated volume again with just a CD or the radio. If there is no volume compensation, is it in the radio or somewhere else in the sound system? Same with the bass?