Big Ouch!!!!!!
10-16-2008, 11:14 PM
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-19-2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 878
So glad you are okay...
Say....If you DO end up getting another HHR, and you don't mind my opinion,
make sure to get one with side air bags. I believe that all of the 2009's may have this as stock. On my 2008 it was an option.
Your pics really brought this to mind......
Cajun
Say....If you DO end up getting another HHR, and you don't mind my opinion,
make sure to get one with side air bags. I believe that all of the 2009's may have this as stock. On my 2008 it was an option.
Your pics really brought this to mind......
Cajun
10-16-2008, 11:28 PM
#12
Banned
Join Date: 10-24-2006
Location: The Show-Me State
Posts: 1,761
That girl is real lucky to be alive herself. Those old Chevy trucks aren't exactly the safest vehicle to get in a wreck with. If she really t-boned you going 45 MPH, that safety cage on the HHR must be pretty stout and those doors did a great job reacting to the impact energy.
10-17-2008, 09:39 AM
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-21-2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 939
I'm actually glad that mine did not have side impact airbags when I was hit. I've been told by a couple of people that they can actually do more harm than good. My mom rolled a new full size conversion van (Ford model) last Christmas and the first responders mentioned that she was very lucky that the side impacts and front airbags did not deploy because they likely would have hurt her. One other person I know was in a side impact collision where the side impact airbags deployed and they caused burns and some pretty serious bruising to the side of hos torso.
Here are the images from my collision. The HHR holds up really well and is pretty solid.
10-17-2008, 07:08 PM
#16
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 06-23-2008
Location: Branson, Mo
Posts: 47
Thanks to everyone for their thoughts and concerns. Feeling better physically, still sore and stiff neck. Got estimate today just under
$10k !!!!!!!!!!! Not feeling any better mentally. Now the fight begins as to total or not. By the way, I discovered a fast method of removing all those snap-in interior panels. Not recommended though.
$10k !!!!!!!!!!! Not feeling any better mentally. Now the fight begins as to total or not. By the way, I discovered a fast method of removing all those snap-in interior panels. Not recommended though.
10-17-2008, 08:35 PM
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-05-2008
Location: Akron Ohio
Posts: 5,464
Glad your ok.
After eating one airbag I am not sure I would want to have side bag.
Myt wheel bag went off in a low speed impact and it burned me and cut me up pretty good.
IF the bag had not gone off I would have not gotten a scratch.
I think I would rather see more improvments on belts and take my chace with out the air bag.
FYI: check out on Youtube some guy names Farmer Dave. He has set off airbags in Freezers. Microwaves and Stoves. The Saturn bags do not do much damage but the Ford blew up the freezer and stove. The door of the freezer went about 100 yards.
After eating one airbag I am not sure I would want to have side bag.
Myt wheel bag went off in a low speed impact and it burned me and cut me up pretty good.
IF the bag had not gone off I would have not gotten a scratch.
I think I would rather see more improvments on belts and take my chace with out the air bag.
FYI: check out on Youtube some guy names Farmer Dave. He has set off airbags in Freezers. Microwaves and Stoves. The Saturn bags do not do much damage but the Ford blew up the freezer and stove. The door of the freezer went about 100 yards.
10-19-2008, 11:12 PM
#18
Banned
Join Date: 10-24-2006
Location: The Show-Me State
Posts: 1,761
Airbags are designed to reduce the kinetic energy applied to the body and spread it out over a large area. Sure, you'll get a burn, some bruises, and a superficial scratch or two, but it beats a fractured skull or collapsed lung.
The new airbags that reduce power based on seat belt usage and weight restrictions are much better than the old Nader air bags. Ralph Nader insisted on the government forcing the auto manufacturers to make the original systems protect an unbelted occupant the same as a belted occupant. Several children and smaller people were decapitated as a result, but Nader couldn't sue 'em because he had caused the problem!
The new airbags that reduce power based on seat belt usage and weight restrictions are much better than the old Nader air bags. Ralph Nader insisted on the government forcing the auto manufacturers to make the original systems protect an unbelted occupant the same as a belted occupant. Several children and smaller people were decapitated as a result, but Nader couldn't sue 'em because he had caused the problem!
10-20-2008, 06:07 AM
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-05-2008
Location: Akron Ohio
Posts: 5,464
Airbags are designed to reduce the kinetic energy applied to the body and spread it out over a large area. Sure, you'll get a burn, some bruises, and a superficial scratch or two, but it beats a fractured skull or collapsed lung.
The new airbags that reduce power based on seat belt usage and weight restrictions are much better than the old Nader air bags. Ralph Nader insisted on the government forcing the auto manufacturers to make the original systems protect an unbelted occupant the same as a belted occupant. Several children and smaller people were decapitated as a result, but Nader couldn't sue 'em because he had caused the problem!
The new airbags that reduce power based on seat belt usage and weight restrictions are much better than the old Nader air bags. Ralph Nader insisted on the government forcing the auto manufacturers to make the original systems protect an unbelted occupant the same as a belted occupant. Several children and smaller people were decapitated as a result, but Nader couldn't sue 'em because he had caused the problem!
We all would be even more safe in helmets and Nomex but you have to draw the line somewhere.
Ralph never goes after things like poor drivers or DUI drivers with 15 DUI charges. He is all abouyt hitting the corperations but no the end user and their own action like DUI and Cell Phone use. .
Also they should have done something with Ralph a long time ago.
By the way they were not just superficial scratchs. They were deep cuts.
I guess when you on the recieving end of an air bag it gives you a different outlook.
10-20-2008, 06:08 AM
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-05-2008
Location: Akron Ohio
Posts: 5,464
Airbags are designed to reduce the kinetic energy applied to the body and spread it out over a large area. Sure, you'll get a burn, some bruises, and a superficial scratch or two, but it beats a fractured skull or collapsed lung.
The new airbags that reduce power based on seat belt usage and weight restrictions are much better than the old Nader air bags. Ralph Nader insisted on the government forcing the auto manufacturers to make the original systems protect an unbelted occupant the same as a belted occupant. Several children and smaller people were decapitated as a result, but Nader couldn't sue 'em because he had caused the problem!
The new airbags that reduce power based on seat belt usage and weight restrictions are much better than the old Nader air bags. Ralph Nader insisted on the government forcing the auto manufacturers to make the original systems protect an unbelted occupant the same as a belted occupant. Several children and smaller people were decapitated as a result, but Nader couldn't sue 'em because he had caused the problem!
We all would be even more safe in helmets and Nomex but you have to draw the line somewhere.
Ralph never goes after things like poor drivers or DUI drivers with 15 DUI charges. He is all abouyt hitting the corperations but no the end user and their own action like DUI and Cell Phone use. .
Also they should have done something with Ralph a long time ago.
By the way they were not just superficial scratchs. They were deep cuts.
I guess when you on the recieving end of an air bag it gives you a different outlook. There are times they help but how often do they do more damage in minor crashes?