General HHR Discuss anything related to the Chevy HHR that doesnt seem to fit into the more specific categories below.

HHR vs Highlander MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2008, 08:31 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
RaceOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-2006
Location: Dixie
Posts: 118
Angry HHR vs Highlander MPG

This last week I was driving around the frozen Upper Midwest visiting family and had the opportunity to see my brother-in-law's new Toyota Highlander, Limited. Got to say, it's a very nice ride. V6, leather, bluetooth, AWD, blah, blah, blah. We had to take a trip from his house in WI to parent's house in MN. He had four people, I had three in HHR. We both got fuel together before we left WI and when we arrived in MN. Compared mileage, HHR 23.1, Highlander 24.6. Return trip took us through Minneapolis, then back to WI. Filled up again, HHR 24.1, Highlander 25.1. WTF? We did not use DIC to figure mileage, rather the more accurate calculator method.

HHR is a 2LT, 2.4, auto with 11,000+ miles. Highlander is a 2008, V6, auto, AWD, 5000+ miles. We both drove the interstate, one behind the other and sometimes side by side, 65-75 MPH. This does not make sense! The Toyota is heavier, wider and much taller. I'm not complaining about the HHR mileage because that is what I usually get, I'm PO'd because the much larger Toyota kicked my a$$. So much for GM's fuel economy standards.

Pat
RaceOn is offline  
Old 02-01-2008, 09:21 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
eat_world's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-21-2007
Location: Limerick, Pa
Posts: 387
Wow does the 2.2 get that much better gas mileage, i get atleast 30 mpg in the same conditions, i would talk to your dealer.
eat_world is offline  
Old 02-01-2008, 09:29 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
ksfis43's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-08-2007
Location: Marysville, PA
Posts: 405
I too have been disappointed in the fuel economy.
Before the HHR I had a Pontiac Montana Mini Van, V-6, Loaded.
With the van I got about 24 -25 MPG, with the HHR I only improved that by 1-2 MPG
ksfis43 is offline  
Old 02-01-2008, 09:33 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
eat_world's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-21-2007
Location: Limerick, Pa
Posts: 387
Originally Posted by ksfis43
I too have been disappointed in the fuel economy.
Before the HHR I had a Pontiac Montana Mini Van, V-6, Loaded.
With the van I got about 24 -25 MPG, with the HHR I only improved that by 1-2 MPG
when it comes to high way mileage i made a lateral move, but i made a huge move up.
caprice 30/15 350/700R4/2.73 rear gears
HHR 30-35 highway depending on how i'm feeling that day, 25-28 normally, but can get much worse depending on how heavy my foot feels that day.
eat_world is offline  
Old 02-01-2008, 09:39 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
hhrcrafty's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-24-2006
Location: The Show-Me State
Posts: 1,761
My old Blazer got 15-18 MPG. My HHR gets 26-32. I wouldn't feel too bad about the Highlander. It's basically a jacked up Camry with taller tires.
hhrcrafty is offline  
Old 02-01-2008, 10:01 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
pitbull76's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-20-2006
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 931
I would also check your tire pressure. I get the kind of mileage you did in mixed driving; almost always upper 20's on the highway. I too have the 2LT 2.4L, and I don't even put premium gas in it.
pitbull76 is offline  
Old 02-01-2008, 10:05 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
TomR00's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-02-2007
Location: Greencastle, PA
Posts: 152
What's the horsepower difference between the HHR and the Highlander. Also was that with regular or premimum gas?

TomR
TomR00 is offline  
Old 02-01-2008, 10:08 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
tim_tenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-02-2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,529
My 2.2L auto is averaging 26.7 in my daily drive (mix of highway, city street and stop-and-go). First open interstate trip of 420 miles (210 down, 210 back), averaged 30.3. This is calculator method. DIC is off by just over 1 MPG. Interstate trip was 75 MPH, using cruise as often as possible. 2 adults and 4 dogs in the car. Only 2,500 miles on the HHR, and gas mileage usually improves with time on a new car (my experience).
tim_tenn is offline  
Old 02-01-2008, 10:21 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
an08HHR's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-14-2007
Location: xxxxx-xx
Posts: 1,441
I went to http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/sbs.htm and the HHr really should of been the better of the two unless the Highlander was a Hybird
an08HHR is offline  
Old 02-01-2008, 10:31 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
MWG2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-14-2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,240
Here is what I have discovered with my 2.4L running premium gas:

55 MPH = 32 to 36 MPG.

65 MPH = 24 MPG.

70 MPH = 22 MPG.

YES, that big of a difference! It appears when the tach stays at 2,000 RPM, gas mileage is excellent. As soon as I go over the 2,000 RPM, gas mileage decreases considerably.

So obviously the engine is running at peak MPG at 2,000 RPM, which in my HHR happens to be 55 MPH.
MWG2 is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 PM.