sts turbo reply
11-16-2005 | 03:00 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: 10-27-2005
Posts: 29
From: cali
sts turbo reply
luis:
The system we did on the HHR was prototype. We're still waiting on the availability of tuning. Our base line was 119 fwhp and we were at around 195 fwhp at 7 psi. We were fighting the torque mangement system on the automatic as well as tuning problems. If we offer a system for the Ecotech engines, 200+ fwhp should be pretty standard.
Thanks,
Shade Ferre
801-224-3477 ext 802
866-WE TURBO ext 802
The system we did on the HHR was prototype. We're still waiting on the availability of tuning. Our base line was 119 fwhp and we were at around 195 fwhp at 7 psi. We were fighting the torque mangement system on the automatic as well as tuning problems. If we offer a system for the Ecotech engines, 200+ fwhp should be pretty standard.
Thanks,
Shade Ferre
801-224-3477 ext 802
866-WE TURBO ext 802
Great I cant wait. More Power. 
11-16-2005 | 07:29 PM
#5
Banned
Joined: 10-14-2005
Posts: 9,121
From: Rochester,N.Y.
I'm warming to owning a 4 banger again. If I'm going to own it I might as well support it. 
From everything I have read about the Ecotec it looks like it can handle a decent amount of horsepower on the stock internals. That makes it nice for a guy like me who likes to work on his own car. I dont have the facility to pull and rebuild my engine. No matter what I still wish the HHR was RWD.
From everything I have read about the Ecotec it looks like it can handle a decent amount of horsepower on the stock internals. That makes it nice for a guy like me who likes to work on his own car. I dont have the facility to pull and rebuild my engine. No matter what I still wish the HHR was RWD.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post