General HHR Discuss anything related to the Chevy HHR that doesnt seem to fit into the more specific categories below.

Wheel bearings and 100,000 mile warranty

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-2011 | 02:55 PM
  #1  
rhales's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 07-12-2010
Posts: 12
From: NC
Wheel bearings and 100,000 mile warranty

Just wondering, I was told that GM has now excluded the wheel bearings from the 100,000 mile warranty. Since mine is a 2009 with 77,000 miles does this mean my vehicle is still covered ??? The person said they thought it did not change until 2010 models, but was not for sure. Anyone who may have recently had some replaced please let me know. I really hate to pay out of pocket for this. Thanks,
Old 12-21-2011 | 04:07 PM
  #2  
ChevyMgr's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Joined: 11-23-2007
Posts: 8,210
From: Texas
Yours are covered. 2010 - 2011 are not.
Old 12-21-2011 | 04:24 PM
  #3  
nacademus's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-11-2010
Posts: 904
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Sorry to thread-jack, but why did they change the policy on the 2010 and 2011 models? Do you know if they changed anything about the bearings to make them better, or did they just decide to say "eh, screw em" to those who bought a '10,'11 vehicle?
Old 12-21-2011 | 05:05 PM
  #4  
ChevyMgr's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Joined: 11-23-2007
Posts: 8,210
From: Texas
They don't tell peons like me that kind of information.
Old 12-21-2011 | 05:35 PM
  #5  
nacademus's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-11-2010
Posts: 904
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Oh. Touche' I just didn't know if they had a different part number during the later years or anything. No big deal.
Old 12-21-2011 | 08:02 PM
  #6  
CeliaFoote's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-28-2009
Posts: 55
From: Orlando, FL
Just had my right bearing replaced yesterday!

I have 2009, 84k miles...Zero cost to me, so I'd say it's covered for you!
Old 12-21-2011 | 08:51 PM
  #7  
ChevyMgr's Avatar
Founding Member
 
Joined: 11-23-2007
Posts: 8,210
From: Texas
Originally Posted by nacademus
Oh. Touche' I just didn't know if they had a different part number during the later years or anything. No big deal.
I'm sure numbers have changed but the hubs are problems with a lot car lines. I'm sure there is an answer as to why nobody can make a quality bearing with a low failure rate. I just don't know what it is.
Old 12-22-2011 | 03:29 PM
  #8  
Laco's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-22-2009
Posts: 763
From: Southern California
Originally Posted by ChevyMgr
I'm sure numbers have changed but the hubs are problems with a lot car lines. I'm sure there is an answer as to why nobody can make a quality bearing with a low failure rate. I just don't know what it is.
My guess is a high quality low failure rate bearing could be manufactured, but it would cost more.
Old 12-27-2011 | 08:17 AM
  #9  
ZTony8's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-11-2008
Posts: 663
From: Eastpointe,MI.
The part number hasn't been changed since the HHR debuted so it's unlikely that there's been a spec change or a vendor change-two reasons why GM changes part numbers.
Old 12-27-2011 | 09:37 AM
  #10  
hyperv6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-05-2008
Posts: 5,464
From: Akron Ohio
Originally Posted by ChevyMgr
I'm sure numbers have changed but the hubs are problems with a lot car lines. I'm sure there is an answer as to why nobody can make a quality bearing with a low failure rate. I just don't know what it is.
The answer is to go back to a roller tapper bearing but fine one that has less drag.

It is not so much the quality as it is the type of bearing. With the rollers they use now it gives less contact on the bearing and a bearing thar rolls much more free. This helps in gas milage.

The price you pay is even with a good quality bearing the ball bearing takes much more abuse since all the force and pressure is focused on a small contact area.

The rollers never had an issue as they spread the force out over a larger area. But then they also produced more drag.

I have friends at Timken Bearing here locally and that is what I have been told. They have been looking for ways to make a better design that is stronger but it is difficult to keep them efficent.

There is alot of work going on here but so far there is no magic bullet to solve this delema.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 AM.