17 inch wheels too...

 

OK, different deal now. Tail pipe tip, wheels, running boards & roof rails, fog lights & chrome appearance package. Looking more like 2LT.

 

The VIN seems to decode for a 2.4

 

I think it's a 2LT, & the pricing is not off the chart.

 

Just a opinion as requested, no disrespect to those who think otherwise ...

For a 1LT even if clean they’re dreaming. For an (actually) clean 2LT with those low miles it may be worth looking at just to learn something, and seeing if you can start the negotiation at 1/2 the price. You need to look at a LOT of cars to avoid over paying. Don’t fall in love with any car until AFTER you’ve agreed to a fair price.
EDIT - something in the back of my mind thinks there was never a “2LT” on the top line of the sticker back then, done with options or package to the same effect, until 2008, maybe? Feel free to educate me.

 

Correct the 1LT or 2LT designations are in the list on the RPO sticker in the glove box

 

Thanks for the replies. It's still listed but I haven't had the chance to get to the lot (if open?) to check it over closer. I bought my HHR to see if I'd like the function (I do) as the HHR design fits my style eye since I was a young boy and bought a 1947 pick-up basket case. (another story) I would consider therefore I look for better optioned, conditioned, and lower mileage truckettes. I don't equate rare with higher than market value in the HHR model class with a few exceptions.

I did see a black/black early resto-mod Chevrolet pick-up modern chassis suspension 450hp on Mecum (LasVegas? rerun) this morning (bid went on at $45K) that intrigued me more than a low mileage HHR SS or an SSR. SSR's for some reason don't give me the same woowho. But of course the $$$ was a lot more too.

 

My 2007 is a 2LT...

 

And it wouldn't be on the top line of the sticker anyway, it would be buried, in the lower half of the codes.

 

It might be on the top line of the window sticker , but not the 1 or 2 part







Another example