Worst SS Panel EVER!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

08-07-2015 | 05:11 AM

#11

Dbeluscak

Senior Member

Joined: 05-29-2015

Posts: 542

From: Cleveland, OH

Should've used an LT/S! Anything other than that. Do you think they new there were only 216 when they did this? It's like taking a Yenko Chevelle and saying, "I think I'm going to clone a Malibu!"

My 2 cents

Last edited by Dbeluscak; 08-07-2015 at 05:13 AM. Reason: @donbrew-I need a link in your sig to figure out this text size! kidding..lol

08-07-2015 | 08:28 AM

#12

DwRed2LT

Senior Member

Joined: 10-04-2013

Posts: 902

From: Gateway to the West

Dang ~

08-07-2015 | 10:55 AM

#13

TICITRD

Member

Joined: 05-04-2009

Posts: 52

From: Chino Valley, AZ

Omg!!!!

08-08-2015 | 09:27 PM

#14

Ron S

Senior Member

Joined: 12-02-2010

Posts: 840

From: Roanoke Va

That is one bad case of the UGLIES!

08-09-2015 | 03:26 PM

#15

2manyvans

Senior Member

Joined: 04-20-2011

Posts: 847

From: Ohio

On the other side of the coin... Oil changes would be easy, Detailing the underside would be a breeze, and backing up to a loading dock, right height.
I don't know what you would haul in it. I know mine hauls *SS ! Sorry, I can't leave this thread alone, john