HHR SS Topics and information on the 2008-2010 Chevy HHR SS Turbocharged models.

Ss build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-2010, 11:04 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ssdivin's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 115
Ss build

Well lost compression on #3 on my 2008 ss so pics will come
Spec stage 2 clutch
Spec flywheel

Ebc drilled rotors
Ebc green stuff pads

Arp headstuds
Wiseco pistons

Work will start monday
Head machined
ssdivin is offline  
Old 10-22-2010, 05:42 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
hyperv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-05-2008
Location: Akron Ohio
Posts: 5,464
Go Red on the pads and it will have less dust and work as well or better.
hyperv6 is offline  
Old 10-22-2010, 07:06 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
bartSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-20-2008
Location: Chi-Towns burbs
Posts: 1,682
I dunno about the head man. ZZP went back to the stock head on a stock turbo and still ran an 11.xx

But if youre going big turbo then for sure. In the mean time you will lose a little bit of power with a ported head on the stock turbo
bartSS is offline  
Old 10-22-2010, 07:15 AM
  #4  
Member
 
windsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-27-2010
Location: Scranton, PA
Posts: 68
Originally Posted by bartSS
But if youre going big turbo then for sure. In the mean time you will lose a little bit of power with a ported head on the stock turbo
What's the reason for this? I would think better flow + same flash = same power but better efficiency.
windsmith is offline  
Old 10-22-2010, 08:17 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
JeramieJJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-11-2009
Location: WI
Posts: 327
Originally Posted by windsmith
What's the reason for this? I would think better flow + same flash = same power but better efficiency.
He will explain in more detail, my first guess is your still pushing same amount of air. you would actually be better off keeping head same and upping turbo for what your assuming. I am not positive, but I think the stock turbo is about out of steam with the current head....so bigger head is bad. Upping both is of course a great idea.

This is often done in error when building SBC V8 engines...many times too big of heads are put on.
JeramieJJ is offline  
Old 10-22-2010, 09:02 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ssdivin's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 115
I will be puting a big turbo after the motor.
ssdivin is offline  
Old 10-22-2010, 11:03 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
JeramieJJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-11-2009
Location: WI
Posts: 327
Originally Posted by ssdivin
I will be puting a big turbo after the motor.
Ah, then your planning is perfect.
JeramieJJ is offline  
Old 10-22-2010, 12:14 PM
  #8  
Banned
 
bartSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-20-2008
Location: Chi-Towns burbs
Posts: 1,682
Originally Posted by windsmith
What's the reason for this? I would think better flow + same flash = same power but better efficiency.
Yes the stock head is more then enough for the stock turbo but since youre going big turbo then youre right on track man. Best of luck with the build . I was gonna build mine but im actually selling all the aftermarket stuff now and will be selling the car.
bartSS is offline  
Old 11-06-2010, 09:28 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ssdivin's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 115




ssdivin is offline  
Old 11-06-2010, 10:04 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ssdivin's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 115
Oh new turbo and intercooler ect ect
ssdivin is offline  


Quick Reply: Ss build



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 PM.