The Lounge Off Topic PG-13.
Warning: The Lounge may contain irrelevant and off topic discussions that may not be related to anything HHR. If you are not interested in these kinds of discussions, do not read or respond to these threads.

New Seatbelt LAw as of Sept. 1st

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2009, 11:37 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
donbb82's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-21-2007
Location: Janesville, Wisconsin
Posts: 472
I always wear my seatbelt too.
donbb82 is offline  
Old 08-26-2009, 08:51 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Jeff®'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-2008
Location: Fairport Harbor, OH
Posts: 2,358
Originally Posted by donbb82
I know I will get some heat on this one, BUT why is it mandatory that we need to wear seat belts and motorcyclists do not have to wear helmets??
Strong Lobby.


It started way back when Reagan was in bed with Harley-Davidson.
Jeff® is offline  
Old 08-26-2009, 09:21 AM
  #23  
Founding Member
 
ChevyMgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,210
I wear a helmet on my porch.

https://www.chevyhhr.net/forums/show...3784&page=4#37
ChevyMgr is offline  
Old 08-26-2009, 09:35 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
VictorySpark08's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-29-2008
Location: Crystal Lake
Posts: 839
A law doesn't mean anything. I have family down in a AR, even if its a law alot of folks won't bother.

Whatever there choice is they have to live with it, until they go through the windshield.
VictorySpark08 is offline  
Old 08-26-2009, 11:42 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
GDZHHR's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-30-2006
Location: Maryland Heights, MO
Posts: 9,149
I don't get it. People don't this law, but like the one in another thread about texting! With others doing so many stupid this like texting, putting on make-up, etc...I don't see anything wrong with requiring me to wear a seatbelt to protect me from other peoples stupidity!

Missouri is trying to do away with the helmet law too, and I think it's just wrong. Laws are not for the people with common sense and good judgement. They are their to protect the people who either just don't care or are too stupid to understand and therefore protect all of us!
GDZHHR is offline  
Old 08-26-2009, 11:49 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
solman98's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-17-2006
Location: Dallas, GA
Posts: 6,052
Originally Posted by GDZHHR
I don't get it. People don't this law, but like the one in another thread about texting! With others doing so many stupid this like texting, putting on make-up, etc...I don't see anything wrong with requiring me to wear a seatbelt to protect me from other peoples stupidity!

Missouri is trying to do away with the helmet law too, and I think it's just wrong. Laws are not for the people with common sense and good judgement. They are their to protect the people who either just don't care or are too stupid to understand and therefore protect all of us!
Maybe the next time some asks why they should be required to wear a seatbelt, show them that link.......
solman98 is offline  
Old 08-26-2009, 12:22 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
mgfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-11-2009
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 162
Originally Posted by GDZHHR
I don't get it. People don't this law, but like the one in another thread about texting! With others doing so many stupid this like texting, putting on make-up, etc...I don't see anything wrong with requiring me to wear a seatbelt to protect me from other peoples stupidity!

Missouri is trying to do away with the helmet law too, and I think it's just wrong. Laws are not for the people with common sense and good judgement. They are their to protect the people who either just don't care or are too stupid to understand and therefore protect all of us!
The problem with a lot of these laws are that they are used for revenue enhancement. Overzealous enforcement officers and cash strapped municipalities abuse them to substitute for shrinking revenues. One of the main reasons that the seatbelt law was repealed for a short time in Mass was that roadblocks were set up to check for seatbelt violations, even though they were not allowed by the very law they were enforcing.
mgfred is offline  
Old 08-26-2009, 12:32 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
GDZHHR's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-30-2006
Location: Maryland Heights, MO
Posts: 9,149
Originally Posted by mgfred
The problem with a lot of these laws are that they are used for revenue enhancement. Overzealous enforcement officers and cash strapped municipalities abuse them to substitute for shrinking revenues. One of the main reasons that the seatbelt law was repealed for a short time in Mass was that roadblocks were set up to check for seatbelt violations, even though they were not allowed by the very law they were enforcing.
If we eliminated laws which were abused, we would be left with few laws. IMO, not a good en ought reason not to have the law. When abuse if found it should be addressed, the law may need to be adjusted, but laws like this shouldn't be eliminated.

My Mom is a perfect example of why having laws like this are important. She HATES to wear a seatbelt. She did not begin to wear one until the law went into effect. She also happens to have an issue with seizures, not to mention she is a bad driver to begin with. If the law had not been made and seat belts were optional, she would never use it. So if she had another accident, she has had a few, she would likely be more seriously injured. She only wears it because the law says she has too.
GDZHHR is offline  
Old 08-26-2009, 03:11 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
AJochum's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-24-2008
Location: USA
Posts: 725
Originally Posted by 09_SS
This is my only problem w/ making you wear seatbelts. WI just passed where you can get pulled over for not having them on, but motorcyclist dont need helmets. At least i have a windshield and and stearing wheel to keep me in the vehicle. But i guess a helmet for a motorcyclist in a severe accident is only the difference between and open or closed casket. I always were my seatbelt no matter what and have even got my wife to do the same. When we first started dating she never wore hers, now she always does cuz I would bug her and/or stop in the middle of the road until she put it on. I think everyone should wear them, but it is not the governments job to take away our choice. Whats next helmets in the car? Maybe when traveling over a certain speed? I bet we could save even more lives if people were required to wear helmets in a vehicle.
Or my favorite - Seat belt law - helmet law - and then you see a pickup truck with 4 people loaded in the bed, sitting on the side of the fenders. Of course, it's possible they could all bounce out and have no brain damage.
AJochum is offline  
Old 08-26-2009, 03:50 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
HHR_style's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-13-2009
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 466
This morning I saw a guy in his van driving towards me with his head down. He was looking at his cell phone (I assume he was texting). He was driving in his lane & we didn't have a head-on wreck, but it was a little sketchy.
PS I always wear my seat belts. Always have. I'd wear a helmet too (if I rode a street bike). Seems like common sense to me.
HHR_style is offline  


Quick Reply: New Seatbelt LAw as of Sept. 1st



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 AM.