pt loser
#11
after owning both, i can honestly say if the HHR pulled the trigger its more because the HHR is a superior ride when compared point to point with the pt, the only thing i liked better about the pt, the lift gate went higher when opened. in every other way the HHR is better, more room, more gitty yup, better handling. you cant exactly blame another retro for killing the pt when dodge just plain tries to shine up a turd and call it a diamond.
#15
So you saying you can't see the image?
here is the link. http://www.allpar.com/trucks/jeep/liberty-2008.html second picture on the page
#16
So you saying you can't see the image?
here is the link. http://www.allpar.com/trucks/jeep/liberty-2008.html second picture on the page
here is the link. http://www.allpar.com/trucks/jeep/liberty-2008.html second picture on the page
#18
I loved the PT design when it first came out..but then they sold so darned many of the things I didn't want one. A "different" design that becomes commonplace takes the fun out of it for me. For that reason, while I want the HHR to stay around for awhile I'm just as happy not to see that many of them on the road.
Another point regarding the PT...and I know it's been said here before but it bears repeating...if Chrysler hadn't introduced the PT it's doubtful that GM would have come out with the HHR.
Another point regarding the PT...and I know it's been said here before but it bears repeating...if Chrysler hadn't introduced the PT it's doubtful that GM would have come out with the HHR.
#20