View Poll Results: Does Britney Spears deserve all the negative criticism about her VMA performance?
Yes, it was truly a horrible moment in TV history
37
41.57%
No, she looked fine, and people are being too tough on her
9
10.11%
The performance was lazy, but stop harping on her looks -- she's hardly fat
43
48.31%
Voters: 89. You may not vote on this poll
VMAs - Britney Spears
09-11-2007, 08:58 AM
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-25-2006
Location: Enid, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,198
"9 out of 10 voices in my head say I'd hit that!" 
She looks good for having kids not too long ago. Honestly, I'm surprised she looked that good, considering the circumstances.
I didn't see the performance, and don't care too. Lip syncing is never good, IMO. If you make it big in the music business, you have a responsibility to uphold and use your talent, not fake your own music. It's cheap, rude, and unacceptable.
She looks good for having kids not too long ago. Honestly, I'm surprised she looked that good, considering the circumstances.
I didn't see the performance, and don't care too. Lip syncing is never good, IMO. If you make it big in the music business, you have a responsibility to uphold and use your talent, not fake your own music. It's cheap, rude, and unacceptable.
09-11-2007, 09:14 AM
#22
Banned
Join Date: 10-14-2005
Location: Rochester,N.Y.
Posts: 9,121
So is the way of pop music though. 
If you think about it logically a lot of pop artist have to lip-synch because of the high amount of dance and so forth that goes into one of their performances. If they were actually singing on top of being winded from their high energy dance routines it would sound like crap and nothing like the studio recordings. I'm not a fan of lip-synching or anything like that but it makes sense to me why pop artists do it and why the fans accept it.
If you think about it logically a lot of pop artist have to lip-synch because of the high amount of dance and so forth that goes into one of their performances. If they were actually singing on top of being winded from their high energy dance routines it would sound like crap and nothing like the studio recordings. I'm not a fan of lip-synching or anything like that but it makes sense to me why pop artists do it and why the fans accept it.
09-11-2007, 09:15 AM
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-25-2006
Location: Enid, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,198
So is the way of pop music though. If you think about it logically a lot of pop artist have to lip-synch because of the high amount of dance and so forth that goes into one of their performances. If they were actually singing on top of being winded from their high energy dance routines it would sound like crap and nothing like the studio recordings. I'm not a fan of lip-synching or anything like that but it makes sense to me why pop artists do it and why the fans accept it.
If you think about it logically a lot of pop artist have to lip-synch because of the high amount of dance and so forth that goes into one of their performances. If they were actually singing on top of being winded from their high energy dance routines it would sound like crap and nothing like the studio recordings. I'm not a fan of lip-synching or anything like that but it makes sense to me why pop artists do it and why the fans accept it. Yea... Guess you got me there... Normally I would say I'm there for the music, but in this case, I'd really like to watch her dance
She "Looked" good, to me anyway, but the performance itself left a lot to be desired. Was like she didn't really want to be there.
And she shouldn't have been!
09-11-2007, 01:22 PM
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-17-2006
Location: Dallas, GA
Posts: 6,052
09-11-2007, 02:29 PM
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-18-2006
Location: Hillcrest, San Diego, CA
Posts: 839