Racing Discussion Race Track Victories - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

1/4 times?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2005 | 12:18 PM
  #11  
vasyclone's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 17
From: Stafford, Virginia
Registration weight is 3019, and I have found that here in virginia that the registration weight is within 1 to 2 hundred pounds of actual wet weight.
Old 11-30-2005 | 12:40 PM
  #12  
captain howdy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-15-2005
Posts: 9,121
From: Rochester,N.Y.
Mine is registered at 3202#. It probably depends on model and options.
Old 12-30-2005 | 02:47 AM
  #13  
SoCalHHR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-14-2005
Posts: 5,359
From: SoCal
CH - I think yours has more "Heavy Metal."
Old 01-02-2006 | 01:47 AM
  #14  
duffy01's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 10-15-2005
Posts: 3
From: sand springs oklahoma
for every 100 lbs it will run one tenth of a second slower, so an extra 1000 lbs compared to a vehicle thats otherwise exactly the same and driven exactly the same it will run 1 second slower.
Old 01-06-2006 | 07:51 PM
  #15  
captain howdy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-15-2005
Posts: 9,121
From: Rochester,N.Y.
Times as posted in the February 2006 Car & Driver. The test HHR had a 2.4 and 5-speed manual.

0-60 mph : 8.0 seconds
0-90 mph : 17.4 seconds
1/4 mile : 16.1 seconds @ 87 mph
Rolling 5-60 mph: 8.9 seconds
The top speed is 126
Old 01-20-2006 | 12:16 PM
  #16  
Vita's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 01-13-2006
Posts: 19
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by captain howdy
Times as posted in the February 2006 Car & Driver. The test HHR had a 2.4 and 5-speed manual.

0-60 mph : 8.0 seconds
0-90 mph : 17.4 seconds
1/4 mile : 16.1 seconds @ 87 mph
Rolling 5-60 mph: 8.9 seconds
The top speed is 126
numbers seem botched. 0-60 at 8.0 yet 5-60 is 8.9? something doesn't add up...
Old 01-20-2006 | 01:06 PM
  #17  
captain howdy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-15-2005
Posts: 9,121
From: Rochester,N.Y.
Originally Posted by Vita
numbers seem botched. 0-60 at 8.0 yet 5-60 is 8.9? something doesn't add up...
I thought all cars took longer to get to 60 from a rolling start.
Old 02-16-2006 | 10:08 AM
  #18  
dan-d's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-12-2006
Posts: 847
From: Space Coast, FL
They usually do, because from a dead stop everything hooks up much quicker, and from a rolling start an automatic has to go through the gyrations of kick down and that takes time. With a manual, rolling at 5 MPH usually means your in second gear and at that speed second gear will want to bog the engine. You can do it in first gear but be prepared to shift into second very quickly after you launch because your already rolling and engine RPM is already building.
Old 02-17-2006 | 06:38 PM
  #19  
JoeR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-02-2005
Posts: 1,245
From: VA
After sorting through all the expert / amateur opinions in this thread, I've scientifically concluded why SoCal's HHR is soooo fast....


It's the stubby antenna, folks!! Gotta be worth a full second or more on the 1/4 mi. and at least 15 MPH trap speed!! :)

So... I ordered one of the previously guarded speed-secret antennas!!

Look out world!!!
Old 04-17-2006 | 06:12 PM
  #20  
DragonWagon's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-12-2006
Posts: 23
From: Punxsutawney, Pa
My HHR LT1
From the factory with the 2.2 ecotech and the 5 speed tranny ran

16.868 in the 1/4 mile at a speed of 81.54

now how do i make it faster lol



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 AM.