Racing Discussion Race Track Victories - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

GM looking for Non-GM calibrations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-2008 | 08:31 AM
  #11  
k5hart's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-15-2007
Posts: 100
From: Charleston, SC
[QUOTE=hhrcrafty;236224]If true, that's pretty rotten. If Mitz can't build a car strong enough to handle the power they're advertising, they shouldn't build it in the first place and bill it as a race car. You don't see Subaru doing that with the STi, which they include a free one year SCCA membership with every purchase. If GM started doing that with Corvette, there'd be hell to pay with those owners.[QUOTE]

You hit it right on the head with this quote. I can understand deny repair for tunes that push the limits of the factory components but these days some of the tunes are used for gas mileage more than power and don't hurt a thing. What a shame you can't try and make things better. More reason why I'm seriously thinking about getting rid of the new cars and build something old and reliable. I can fix stuff faster and easier than I can argue with the dealer. The warranty hasn't been good to me anyway.

Just thought about something...I wonder if my K&N is destroying the engine and the rear leveling springs are causing excessive wear on the suspension!!!!
Old 08-21-2008 | 06:29 PM
  #12  
white heat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-22-2008
Posts: 158
From: Oregon
Dodge and Chrysler dealers had a manual come out that showed what modifications looked like, intakes, wga, bigger turbo, etc on the PT turbo and SRT-4.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Blue Lightning
General HHR
12
02-25-2010 09:12 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 PM.